MotoGP

Five huge questions raised by fresh KTM MotoGP exit report

by Valentin Khorounzhiy
6 min read

A fresh report from Austrian media suggests KTM could call time on its MotoGP programme as early as 2026 - which would have massive ramifications for grand prix racing and throw the premier-class rider market into disarray.

The beleaguered Austrian manufacturer, whose parent company Pierer Mobility Group also owns brands like Husqvarna, Gas Gas and the now-for-sale MV Agusta, is in the process of self-administration after having accrued multi-billion Euro liabilities.

Its immediate future has been secured by this process - but there is, inevitably, a major question mark over any and all of its motorsport activities.

It came out earlier after the mid-December insolvency court hearing that, according to creditor association AKV - an insolvency expert which aims to protect its members and clients impacted by businesses going into administration - a withdrawal from MotoGP, Moto2 and Moto3 has been proposed as one of the longer-term cost-saving measures as part of the self-administration restructuring process headed up by administrator Peter Vogl.

This has now been corroborated by reputable Austrian outlet Der Standard, which has gone as far as to state KTM's intention to cull its circuit racing programmes as early as 2026 - linking this to a savings of 46 million Euros.

This, if chosen as the path forward, would be absolutely seismic, not only for the programme itself and its employees but also for MotoGP as a whole. But major questions remain about what such a future would look like.

What's up with the timing?

KTM has confirmed earlier this month following the insolvency court hearing that it will be on the MotoGP grid in 2025. The assets to continue to compete are already in place.

No such confirmation exists over 2026, but continuity into that season would be somewhat logical.

All four riders employed by KTM to represent it on the MotoGP grid are contracted for both years, an engine freeze that kicks in at the start of 2025 and covers 2026 ensures development costs can be kept to a minimum, and KTM is under contract with MotoGP promoter Dorna covering the 2026 season.

Der Standard claims KTM is averse to an immediate exit due to the 'considerable PR damage' this would entail - but the existing agreement with Dorna seems a more pertinent consideration.

If KTM does indeed decide it cannot carry on in MotoGP, an exit prior to the 2027 season starting - when the new MotoGP regulations kick in and when KTM is no longer contracted to compete in MotoGP - would be the most cost-logical scenario.

However, given the scope of KTM's financial difficulties perhaps even an extra season's spending saved - if those savings aren't offset by the financial consequences of breaking its contract with Dorna - is significant enough.

What can outside investment really do?

KTM motorsport boss Pit Beirer has told Speedweek.com that the marque's MotoGP programme is now seeking outside investment - naming Formula 1 legend Lewis Hamilton as one interested party.

It's easy to imagine how KTM's successful, capable works team and its satellite outfit Tech3 continue under the current regs even if the manufacturer involvement is gone or massively scaled down.

After all, the bikes are already built and developed and pretty competitive and the rules are restrictive, meaning they won't get hugely left behind.

But is a 2027 continuation of the programme in some form without KTM involvement truly imaginable?

A MotoGP development budget is still a drop in the bucket compared to some other sports - even if it's something like 50 million, that's less than half the sum even non-manufacturer F1 teams shell out every year, and also what the NBA's Phoenix Suns pay just Bradley Beal, a player you probably haven't heard of and not even that team's best player, yearly.

But it would be a brave investment for someone to pony up without the full resources and know-how of an established bike manufacturer in the frame.

Which teams could re-home KTM's elite line-up?

If you grade by the weakest link, KTM has MotoGP's most solid rider line-up - easily so - after making a big splash with its Tech3 riders for 2025.

Three of its riders have 19 grand prix wins combined. The fourth one, with no grand prix wins, is its best rider.

Pedro Acosta's management has made it clear every rival manufacturer has already been in contact, and there is zero doubt the 20-year-old would be snapped up by somebody immediately upon becoming a free agent.

There's currently no sign of that free agency coming for 2025, but in the seemingly-plausible scenario that KTM remains on the grid even for 2026 but in a scaled-down capacity before withdrawing for 2027, would it really make sense for either the manufacturer or Acosta to see out the contract?

The other three - KTM 'lifer' Brad Binder and new hires Maverick Vinales and Enea Bastianini - would field less interest but are still, just by themselves, a fantastic theoretical 'free agent' class.

However, thanks to MotoGP's tradition of two-year factory contract cycles, the list of rides formally available for 2026 is relatively sparse.

There are multiple rides open at Honda, including works contracts, because it went 'off-sequence' following Marc Marquez's early exit, and Jack Miller's one-year deal with Pramac Yamaha means there's a satellite gig there in the mix, too.

Ducati customer VR46 also has a one-year rider currently, Franco Morbidelli, although Valentino Rossi's team ruthlessly discarding Morbidelli if he's performing at all well is hard to imagine.

Otherwise, though, it's two-year contracts all around, even at somewhere like Trackhouse Aprilia. And though motorsport contracts don't have the reputation for being the most iron-clad, in the premier class they do tend to be honoured these days, and separations are usually initiated by an unsettled rider.

Then again, the KTM quartet becoming available would massively put that to the test.

How does MotoGP avoid a grid number drop?

If KTM does decide it has to pull out in 2026, and agrees terms, Dorna's preference would surely be for the bikes to remain in some capacity until 2027.

But a void would have to be plugged sooner than later.

MotoGP has long targeted a new manufacturer for 2027 - BMW being the most often-linked name - and this would become absolutely essential if KTM cannot continue.

But if a team like Tech3 is available as a manufacturer partner as a result, that is a potential sweetener to any incoming party.

In the scenario where the RC16s somehow can't be on the grid at all in 2026, though, MotoGP could at least potentially count on Ducati to go back to fielding eight bikes - having had to scale down to sixth against its wishes for next year after losing Pramac to Yamaha.

What will the lower classes even look like?

KTM and its sister brands have an absolutely enormous imprint on Moto2 and Moto3. In the former, it's at least only reflected in the branding and staff - but in the latter, it's machinery, too. Most of the Moto3 grid is made up of KTM RC250GPs alongside CF Moto and Honda.

Navigating that is one consideration. Quite another is the level below Moto3, and more specifically the all-KTM Red Bull Rookies Cup. The MotoGP grid is positively replete with Rookies Cup graduates - and it's only become more important now that there's an age-18 limit to enter Moto3.

There is no scenario in which a KTM-less ladder to MotoGP doesn't become immediately unrecognisable.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • More Networks